Criteria for the Sufficiency of a Research Article: Scientific Opinions

Authors

  • Yusuf Celik Biruni University, Medical Faculty, Department of Biostatistics, Istanbul, Turkey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8051-9245
  • Saadet Goksu Celik Biruni University, Medical Faculty, Department of Biostatistics, Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords:

Research article, Methodology, Research design, Scientific opinions

Abstract

Researchers should present their research results in an understandable way to the reader. The content of the publication and the way it is conveyed is a criterion that reveals the value of the work. This also gives a hidden idea of the author's scientific level and his sufficiency in methodology. Any question we know the answer to should not be chosen as a research problem. The first condition to talk about the existence of the problem is to perceive it, to be disturbed by it. In the Research Methodology, this is considered a “problem hit”. To prove knowledge, strong evidence is required. Statistics is the science that develops methods based on strong evidence. Having a professional character is understood when the statements are short, concise, and clear. As a result, it is necessary to start researching within the framework of the views expressed, to analyze and to convey important information to the readers quickly.

Downloads

Published

15-04-2023

How to Cite

Celik, Y., & Goksu Celik, S. (2023). Criteria for the Sufficiency of a Research Article: Scientific Opinions . International Journal of Basic and Clinical Studies, 12(1), 1–6. Retrieved from https://www.ijbcs.com/ijbcs/article/view/ijbcs12101

Issue

Section

Review Article